Re-post from Votaries (2008):
In her essay about Edmund, "King Edmund the Cute: Anatomy of a Girlhood Crush," Diane Peterfreund explains why Edmund is her favorite of the Narnian heroes. He's mine too, and I agree with Peterfreund's perspective. She points out that Edmund qualifies as a bad boy, but what makes him appealing is that he is a reformed bad boy: a bad boy who uses his bad boy past to gain insight into himself and others.
Peterfreund points out, "Edmund . . . seemed [to me] to have pulled it together. He may have been somewhat graver than Peter, but he was still a cheerful guy, overall." In other words, he isn't a brooder.
Totally!
But that got me thinking. I agree with Peterfreund in principle--brooders are a total cliche and sooo boring! But do I agree with her in fact? I decided to go through shows (and books) that I like, list the brooders, and determine their effectiveness:
I have to admit, Angel is a brooder, and I like Angel, but I think much of Angel's broodiness is undercut by Whedon's humor, not to mention Boreanaz's interpretation. Personally, Angel always struck me less as brooding guy and more as intensely introverted guy (which, considering Boreanaz's current alter-ego, the totally extroverted Booth, is fairly impressive). Angel doesn't say much, sure, but I mostly put that down to grumpy guy who lived through the Depression syndrome ("I'm not cheap," Angel explains on Angel. "I'm old.") There's a scene in "Earshot" where Buffy, who can now hear people's thoughts, comes to Angel's house to see if she can "hear" him. After following Angel around his house for several minutes, he finally says, kindly but bemusedly, "You can't hear my thoughts. Why don't you just ask me?" Not exactly brooder behavior.
Still, he does brood more than Spike, who seems to brood mostly in spurts.
Brooder #2: House
Granted, House is a Class-1 brooder. Again, however, the brooding is undercut by the writing. "You don't have Asperger's," Wilson tells him. "You'd like to, but you don't." House is always exposing his psyche to people who don't take his brooding seriously or who at least point out its absurdity. This makes House's brooding tolerable. [I still gave up on the show.]
Brooder #3: Hamlet
Personally, I've always preferred the Mel Gibson action-hero version to Laurence Olivier's blond, swooning prince. I can't speak to Branagh's version. The movie is interesting, but I've never been exactly sure what Branagh was trying to do with Hamlet.
Of course, Arnold Schwarzenegger's version portrays the ultimate non-Brooder!
Brooders #4: The English Detectives
I quite like Wimsey who, like House, seems to deliberately act against his own broodiness, but--sorry, PBS mystery fans!--Morse and Lynley give me a headache. So much angst!! So much melancholy!! Just pull out the violins already. I start checking my watch and wondering what's in my fridge.
 |
| Just look at that brooding face! |
When I was in high school, us arty types swooned over Sidney Carlton, the sarcastic, brooding anti-hero of Tale of Two Cities. I think I would find him rather tiresome now (though he does sacrifice himself). I certainly found the hero of A Separate Peace tiresome (maybe it's just the book). However, I quite like Lord Jim. But not Ethan Frome. Sure, my heroes can brood, but they have got to DO STUFF while they are brooding.
Brooders #6: Mulder & Edward Rochester
Who can forget Mulder?! Mulder is definitely a brooder, but he has the happy accident of being a nutsy brooder. Also, like the brooders I have praised, he is both funny and active. Also, like Edward Rochester (Jane Eyre), he spends his time brooding on one particular problem, at least for the time period that we know him. The brooding has purpose and seems to be less "I'm so self-involved-"oriented and more "other people have made my life miserable; let's expose them!"-oriented. Watching a man brood about himself is far less interesting than watching a man brood about an issue. Mulder may pull people into his worldview but at least it's a worldview that involves dealing with "out there" as opposed to just trying to navigate Mulder's private hell.
Brooders #7: The Women
Yup, women can brood too! Buffy springs to mind although, overall, Buffy is thankfully upbeat (yes, I'm ignoring Season 6). Seven-of-Nine doesn't brood since she belongs to the "I don't like it, I kill it" mode of dealing with problems. B'Elanna, similar to Seven in make-up, broods but in moderation, and Tom is very good at handling her broods.
In sum...
I'm not completely opposed to brooders, but I do have a healthy love of the ordinary guy who (mostly) doesn't brood at all, such as Xander (Buffy), Dave (News Radio), Charles Parker (Lord Peter Wimsey mysteries), almost the entire cast of both Stargates (especially O'Neill and Sheppard), Greg (Dharma & Greg) and Columbo.
And I like the non-brooding gals too: Cuddy (House); Carter (Stargate); Monk's assistants (yes, I am excusing Monk as a brooder--he does brood, but there's just so much else going on in the guy's life, the brooding kind of gets lost); Dharma (D&G), and of course, Scully (who is allowed her occasional brood, considering her circumstances, such as--eh hem--her partner). [From more recent shows, Joan Watson is a great non-brooder and non-supporter of brooding. No enabling in this house!]
Conclusion:
So brooding isn't always a turn-off, so long as the brooder has humor, does something about the brooding, and gets over it (now and again). The brooding is especially tolerable if the brooder is off-set by healthy, upbeat, kind, and cool people. Otherwise, it gets rather tedious.
