data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62e90/62e904ab2fa37a41cb8ce0ffb008676b60de0bad" alt=""
The Christmas Angel series is a set of seven books in which an angel carving, originally created in the mid-1700s, brings together different M/M couples, each in a different time period.
All the books are worth reading. The first three books are the best with Anyta Sunday's clever Shakespeare-tribute Shrewd Angel making a surprise, stellar appearance as number 6.
From a historical point of view, here is what interests me: the first three books use the angel in frankly paranormal ways (but not so much that a plot is lost). In addition, the angel is frankly pro-physical love, neither embarrassed nor squeamish about it.
Eli Easton starts off the series with the origin tale: Christmas Angel. The angel is a fully-fledged character, full of humor and goodwill and a wink. She exists outside her representative, the carved version--like Saint Winifred of the Cadfael Mysteries exists outside her bones. Also like Saint Winifred, she is down to earth, shrewd, and a fan of romance.
Summerfield's Angel by Kim Fielding comes next (if you read them in order, which isn't necessary, but I more or less did). The angel appears again as a character with a message. This time she is even a little bossy!
The angel makes less of a character appearance in Jordan Hawk's Magician's Angel. But her statue is part of a magician's act and she absolutely would not mind.
The books that follow are worth the low price (approximately $4 per novella) but the angel becomes more symbolic, less vital and human and real. L.A. Witt's World War II piece handles its soldiers well (as usual) but the angel seems a bit disconnected from the tale. N.R. Walker's Vietnam War piece--though interesting in its own right--heavily implies that the angel is prudish about human love. And R.J. Scott's tale ends far too abruptly and fails to pay off the angel's possible paranormal whisperings.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ea7c0/ea7c05bd0ecffde0c9cc5a489d6a1dbbbd7b6eb3" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45734/4573493df1a50ba5ecee8248c49705182922d8af" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/02ee5/02ee51377a74a7366a85a6df474fb3b21aac89c6" alt=""
We 21st Century folks like to imagine that we are so bold and brash and frank and--depending on who's talking--salacious and obscene and indecent and pornographic.
The fact is, we aren't anywhere close to any of those things, no matter how we present or criticize ourselves.
![]() |
Truth: In many ways the Victorians were more |
honest about sex than modern Americans. |
20th Century Bohemians were far more |
fastidious than they liked to pretend. |
Do not make the mistake of thinking that all this offense is coming from the right. Or that all of this shocked unease is coming from religious people. Christianity makes a good scapegoat. But old-time Christianity had no trouble discussing sex as a reality. From Paul to Augustine to young pregnant single girls praying to the Virgin Mary, sex was something real to grapple with.
![]() |
The testicle joke at the beginning of Witness is far more |
realistic to agrarian cultures than modern attitudes account for. |
Reality: Puritans told bawdy jokes. And slept together before marriage. And knew all about sex since living near animals kind of gives the plot away. They were well-aware of the vagaries of the human, physical form.
Never trust a historian or a politician or an offended commentator (and there are lots of those out there) that tries to tell you that once upon a time, people were ever so naive and closeted and didn't know all the things we know. Instead, ask yourself what our ancestors would find to laugh about when it comes to us.